In human behavior we do not assume any internal order, if we do not know the individual / individuals. The question is whether the person’s behavior can be absolutely understood or it is completely random. While studying behaviours, fundamental differences can be seen in random behavior, and these differences are quite universal, ie this phenomenon can be traced back - so that within a short time a lot is happening – we have it regularly, we often feel it. It seems that most of our activities follow mechanisms, most of which are similar to the laws of science. But what are the internal motivations of these patterns? If the patterns are determined by our priorities, what will be on the top of the hierarchy? What are the overstated areas that deserve to get momentary monument? Or maybe not overstated, but it is current and it worth to deal with or at least to remember it.

Back to Top